By Rajindar Sachar
The much-published claim that India has achieved food sufficiency conceals
a terrible reality. Even Planning Commission statistics accept that 268
million people in our country do not have enough to eat and half the women
in the age group of 15-19 and three-fourths of the children are anemic.
And yet governments stubbornly refuse to start a food-for-work programme,
which will also give employment to millions. But such is the hold of bureaucratic
oligarchy that this idea is not even being debated in spite of mass deprivation
in Orissa, Gujarat, and Rajasthan.
The richest 25 per cent of Indians consume 43 percent of all production.
Some 90 per cent of Indians, according to the World Development Report
1998, spend $ 2 a day, a figure it considers below the poverty line. What
prevents a violent uprising in such a heart-rending situation is a constant
mystery to me. I can only pray and hope for the development of a strong
ideological political tool, which could fashion this discontent into a
peaceful, purposeful movement for social change in the country.
One of the essential functions of a state is to impartially use its coercive
power against criminality in society. But it is here that it has totally
failed - and that goes for governments of all political parties. The admitted
politician-criminal nexus, which has encouraged criminals to share and
dominate political power has created a situation where the average citizen
has no assurance for his personal safety and honour against the mafia.
The Central Government yielding to globalisation under the tutelage of
the United States is a matter of deep concern. New Delhi's open support
to America's National Missile Defence (NMD) has found us few friends.
Permitting multinationals' entry even in defence production is a shameful
surrender and a dangerous step. Even when defence production is exclusively
in government hands, criminals and other anti-socials have easy access
to armaments. With privatisation and the incursion of the U.S. armament
industry, it would be a veritable opening for the underworld and the international
mafia and thus pose a threat to the country's security and integrity.
The unpardonable manner in which we treat one third of the country's population,
namely Dalits/Tribals, has the potential for a blow-up. Over 80 per cent
of the Dalits are rural-based and half of them are agricultural labourers
notwithstanding the so-called land reforms. Only 25 per cent are cultivators
- the figure has come down from 38 per cent in 1961. In education (1933),
only 16 per cent enrolled at the primary level as against 60 per cent
enrolment among non-Scheduled Castes. But more than the physical and economic
deprivation is the total social alienation and the insults that are heaped
on Dalits. It is still common to find separate wells for them in rural
areas. Even after the earthquake in Gujarat, the Patels refused to allow
the tents for Dalits to be pitched next to theirs. This was a challenge
to our Constitution which had abolished untouchability. In my view, the
inaction of the Gujarat Government against such practices should have
resulted in its dismissal. I was shocked on my visit to Tamil Nadu to
be told by a Dalit Christian priest that so much is the social ostracism
that the Dalit Christians are not allowed to be buried in the same graveyard
as non-dalit Christians. Rammanohar Lohia had warned that "the system
of castes is a terrifying force of stability and against change, a force
that stabilizes all current meanness, dishonour and life." He had
wanted Dalits to be pushed into positions of power. He was clear that
it was futile to talk of revolutionary politics unaccompanied by social
change and further that "only that political party has a future in
the country which would make itself the spearhead of this social revolution
and herald a new dawn."
And yet none of the political parties is willing to take up this issue
as a priority. But then how can you expect this when Mr. Ajit Singh, the
Western Uttar Pradesh Jat leader, when taunted for cozying up to the BJP
justified it by unabashedly saying that "policies and principles
are of no consequence in today's alliance politics. Caste combinations
and mutual interest matter the most". Can political cynicism fall
The Union Government has taken a decision to host the Afro-Asian Games
at a cost of hundreds of crores of rupees even when the country is facing
drought and starvation deaths. The insensitivity of the Government and
politicians who use their position to indulge in self-advancement is disgusting.
Compare this with the friendly chiding to Tagore who asked Gandhiji why
he did not enjoy the beautiful picture of birds singing early in the morning.
Gandhiji reminded Tagore that he had seen birds who for want of food had
no strength left and that he had found it impossible to soothe suffering
with a song from Kabir. The Afro-Asian Games will not put a morsel in
a hungry mouth. It will only feed the petty vanity of the politicians;
but let them remember the grim warning uttered by Gandhiji that "to
people famishing and idle the only acceptable face in which God can dare
appear is work and promise of food as wages".
Looking around, I find an eerie similarity to the period of the French
Revolution which made Rousseau say "when a prince no longer administers
the state according to laws then the state is dissolved, the social past
is broken and political life has been destroyed". Unless our political
leaders heed the warning in time the powder keg could blow up any time.